Connect with us


Best Smartphones under Rs 15,000 in India



Smartphones Under 15,000

The category appears to be more exciting than ever before, and it appeals to a diverse range of users. If you’re looking for a new smartphone, here are the finest options around Rs 15,000 for June 2021.

With the debut of the Redmi Note 10S in mid-May, Xiaomi has made the under Rs 15000 smartphone sector pretty attractive. The Redmi Note 10, Poco X3, and Realme 8G were all interesting possibilities in the category, but the Redmi Note 10S adds to the heat. Most of these phones have AMOLED displays, and some even have high refresh rates and 5G connectivity, which were not available on inexpensive phones until last year.

Redmi Note 10S

Redmi Note 10S
Redmi Note 10S

The Redmi Note 10S is the newest addition to the category, providing interested clients with a better option than the previously existing Redmi Note 10 without boosting the price too much. The base variant of the smartphone costs Rs 14,999. The display is a 6.43-inch Full HD+ AMOLED with a 60Hz refresh rate. It is powered by a MediaTek Helio G95 octa-core processor. The Redmi Note 10S is powered by a 5000mAh battery and runs Android 11.

A 64-megapixel primary camera, an 8-megapixel ultra-wide angle camera, a 2-megapixel depth sensor, and a 2-megapixel macro camera are all included in the phone. It has a 13-megapixel front-facing camera for selfies. In India, the smartphone also debuted MIUI 12.5 which is a refreshing experience to use.

Our conclusion: The Redmi Note 10S appears to be a fantastic smartphone with a nice design, a small form factor, a sharp display, and decent cameras. Given that it covered all price points between Rs 12,000 and Rs 22,000, we still think Xiaomi could have omitted it, but that’s completely a brand decision.

Realme 8 5G

Realme 8 5G
Realme 8 5G

The Realme 8G, which is also priced at Rs 14,999 and, as the name says, supports 5G, is a direct competitor to the Redmi Note 10S. The phone has a 6.5-inch Full-HD+ 90Hz display with a 90.5 screen-to-body ratio and a pixel density of 405 pixels per inch. An octa-core MediaTek Dimensity 700 processor powers the Realme 8 5G.

The 48-megapixel main camera on the Realme 8 5G is accompanied by a 2-megapixel monochrome camera and a 2-megapixel macro camera. There’s a 16-megapixel selfie camera on the front.

Our Judgement – The smartphone is future-ready, which means you won’t need to buy a new phone for at least a year, when India is projected to have the requisite 5G infrastructure. Not only does the phone have 5G, but it also has a silky-smooth display, a long-lasting battery, and likely good cameras.

Redmi Note 10

Redmi Note 10
Redmi Note 10

Despite the competition and subsequent releases, the Redmi Note 10 remains one of the best smartphones around Rs 15,000 in India. It has a Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display and a 6.43-inch Full-HD+ Super AMOLED display with 1100 nits peak brightness. In the retail packaging, the handset comes with a 3300mAh battery and a 33W fast charger. Along with a powerful Snapdragon 678 SoC, there’s also a quad-rea camera configuration.

A 48-megapixel main camera, an 8-megapixel ultra-wide angle camera, a 2-megapixel depth sensor, and a 2-megapixel macro camera are all included in the smartphone. It has a 13-megapixel front-facing camera for selfies.

Conclusion: For the price, we found the Redmi Note 10 to be a very capable device. It has a good display, a stylish design, and a long battery life.

Motorola Moto G30

Moto G30
Moto G30

It’s encouraging to see Motorola learn from its errors and properly price their phones. The Moto G30 is a perfect example of this. The phone has a Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 processor and 4GB of RAM as well as 64GB of storage.

It comes with a 5,000mAh battery and a 20W charger, as well as an HD+ display with a 90Hz refresh rate. A 64-megapixel primary camera, an 8-megapixel ultra-wide angle camera, a 2-megapixel macro camera, and a 2-megapixel depth sensor make up the quad-camera configuration on the Moto G30.

Our Opinion – For Rs 10,999, it offers an impressive camera setup as well as a good processor for simple tasks. Given its price tag, the Moto G30’s battery life is actually quite good. As a result, it qualifies as a budget-friendly device.

Poco X3

Poco X3
Poco X3

The Poco X3 is the only smartphone on this list that stands out from the rest. It’s the only phone under Rs 15,000 with a 120Hz refresh rate and a significantly more powerful chipset. The phone’s 6GB RAM and 64GB storage option is priced at Rs 14,999. A 6000mAh battery, 120Hz refresh rate display, Snapdragon 732 SoC, and 64-megapixel primary camera sensor are all included.

Apart from the processor, the most of the features are identical to those found in the more expensive Poco X3 Pro. Both phones have a striking resemblance in appearance.

Our Verdict: The Poco X3 is a powerful performer that delivers a little more than its price tag. For the ordinary shopper searching for a phone under Rs 15,000, there are a few options.

Dave Daniel has been a Freelancer and Blogger for the past 3 years and is now the proud owner of The Tech Vamps. He has Expertise in the Areas of Technology, Science, Gaming, Gadgets, Hacking, Web Development, etc.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Pixel 5A Reviewed: The Best of Google and Android



Google Pixel 5A

The Pixel 5A is a fine phone, but it’s not perfect. There are a few flaws to be aware of: its security support policy is adequate but not exceptional. It also strangely lacks software support for C-band 5G frequencies, which US carriers will begin using in the coming years. It’s only available in the United States and Japan, and it’s not even available through the big carriers in the United States.

However, Google has managed to remedy some of the shortcomings of its prior A-series models while also lowering the price. That’s not bad for a dull update.


The Pixel 5A has a 6.34-inch 1080p OLED screen, which is somewhat larger than the 4A 5G’s 6.2-inch screen. That’s hardly a massive screen, especially when compared to the 6.5-inch and larger screens found on inexpensive Android phones. It also employs a regular 60Hz refresh rate, so you won’t enjoy the smoother scrolling experience that comes with higher refresh rates like 90 or 120Hz. From the $300 OnePlus N10 5G’s 90Hz screen to the $500 Galaxy A52 5G’s 120Hz panel, this is a feature that has progressively trickled down from the flagship class and is now available in smartphones around the 5A’s price point.

The screen of the 5A isn’t very impressive, but it’s large enough that it doesn’t look as out of place next to the competition as the 4A and 4A 5G do. It’s also just a good screen – the OLED technology produces rich contrast, and it’s bright enough to be viewed outside in direct sunlight without difficulty. The same cannot be said of some of its competitors’ displays, no matter how large they are.

The processor and memory specifications remain unchanged from the 4A 5G: the Pixel 5A employs the same Snapdragon 765G chipset with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage as the 4A 5G. Apps load swiftly, and I didn’t notice any noticeable lags or problems when going about my everyday duties and scrolling through social media.

Complex image processing processes are also completed in a second or two in the background, allowing you to continue snapping portrait mode images without having to wait for each frame to complete processing. I appreciate it as someone who takes far too many portrait mode shots of her cat in the hopes of getting the perfect shot.
The Pixel 5A’s improved battery life over its predecessor is a bigger deal. It has a 4,680mAh battery, compared to 3,885mAh on the 4A 5G. That’s a lot closer to the 5,000mAh batteries that the competition uses. Google calls it “all-day” performance, with up to 48 hours of battery life if extreme battery saver is turned on.

In my real-world tests, I got better results – a day of moderate use with approximately three hours of screentime often drained it down to only 70%. If you’re a heavy user who spends a lot of time on Wi-Fi, you should get at least a day out of the battery, and if you’re a light user who spends a lot of time on Wi-Fi, you should get at least 48 hours.


The Pixel 5A has an IP67 dust and waterproof rating, which means it can be immersed for up to 30 minutes in three feet of water. Outside of the Samsung A52 5G and iPhone SE, official IP ratings are uncommon in the $500-and-under category, so this is one area where the 5A shines.

The phone has Gorilla Glass 3 on the front panel for screen protection, and a metal unibody behind the outer plastic shell. I like the matte surface on the plastic panel because it’s less slippery than a shiny finish and hides smudges better.


Google Pixel 5A
Google Pixel 5A

The 5A comes preloaded with Android 11 and comes with Google’s standard three-year OS and security update agreement. Although this is a longer lifespan than most inexpensive phones, Samsung just began providing four years of security upgrades with its A-series handsets, and Apple will patch the six-year-old iPhone 6S this fall.

The Pixel 5A, of course, comes with 5G connection. It will be available on all major US carriers and, unlike the 4A 5G, will not be available in a mmWave-compatible configuration. Verizon insisted on selling phones that could connect to its super-fast, hard-to-find mmWave 5G network, so Google, like many other companies, created a more expensive version of the 4A 5G that could connect to the network for Verizon’s retail shelves. This time, that will not be the case, and no one will be disappointed.

This year, there is only one color option: black. You may add some color to your life with one of the colorful case options, which are designed to protect your phone from drops and bumps. Some, like “black moss” and “maybe moon” (which also sound like Neko Case song titles? ), are more neutral, but I chose “likely lime” for my review unit, and I do not like it. It has a little Nickelodeon vibe about it from the 1990s. Please return the fabric case to me.

The absence of mmWave 5G isn’t a big deal, but the 5A’s lack of C-band capability at launch is. The nice mid-band material that carriers will gradually begin adding at the end of this year and over the next few years is known as C-band. Although the Pixel 5A has the necessary hardware and FCC certification to use C-band, Google has yet to enable software compatibility for these frequencies. It may add support in the future, but it makes no promises.

It’s surprising that Google won’t commit to supporting C-band when there are a slew of budget and midrange phones on the market right now, starting at $279 for the Galaxy A32. T-Mobile consumers won’t have to worry as much because the company won’t be dependent on the C-band as much. However, if you’re on Verizon or AT&T and expect to keep your phone for the next two to three years, this might become a significant disadvantage when those carriers enable C-band and (theoretically) strengthen their 5G networks.


The camera technology on the 5A doesn’t appear to be particularly intriguing on paper, but it adds up to a lot more than the sum of its parts. Optical image stabilization is included in the 12.2-megapixel main back camera, which is rare for a camera under $500. This type of lens-based stabilization ensures that more of your images remain sharp, which is particularly useful in low-light situations.

A 16-megapixel ultrawide camera is also included, as well as an 8-megapixel selfie camera. When compared to rival phones’ triple- and quad-rear camera arrays, this may not seem like much, but those third and fourth cameras are usually low-quality macro and depth sensors that aren’t really useful anyhow.

If those specifications sound familiar, it’s because they’re the same as the Pixel 5 and Pixel 4A 5G, which is fine for this model. Despite the lack of new sensors or lenses, the 5A still has the greatest photo quality in the midrange segment, thanks in large part to Google’s intelligent image processing. While many of the Pixel 5A’s competitors can capture good images in bright outside light, Google remains the budget class’s low light winner.

What was true of the imaging capabilities of the 4A and 5 is likewise true of the 5A. It does a good job with high-contrast scenarios, and colors are portrayed more organically than on a Samsung phone. Portrait and night mode images are among the best you’ll find on a midrange phone, however you’ll notice their limitations when photographing more difficult subjects. When it comes to equipping the Pixel 6 to compete with the world’s Samsung and Apple flagships, Google has a lot of work ahead of it. It can afford to hold stationary for another year in the budget class because it has such a strong start.

There are phones in the $400 and $500 range that have more flashy distinguishing features than the Google Pixel 5A. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G comes with a 6.5-inch display with a 120Hz refresh rate. The TCL 20 Pro has a curved display similar to that of a flagship phone and supports wireless charging. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a large display and a stylus, of course.

The Pixel 5A, on the other hand, is a good all-arounder with a wonderful UI, quick software upgrades, and all of the essentials covered at a fair price. The 4A 5G was already a good phone, but the 5A’s clever additions, like as waterproofing and a larger battery, make it easier than ever to recommend it to a wide spectrum of individuals.

There’s also the issue of C-band 5G and whether or not Google would support it in the future. It’s difficult to envision the corporation refusing to support it after the frequencies are widely used, but we feel you shouldn’t buy a device today because of a hypothetical update tomorrow. Customers of Verizon and AT&T should be aware of this.

It’s a shame the Pixel 5A will have such a limited distribution, both in terms of countries where it will be accessible and in terms of where it will (and won’t) be sold in the United States, because it’s a phone I’d suggest to a lot of people. It outperforms the competition in some areas, like as camera quality and waterproofing, while falling short in others, such as screen size and battery life.

Because of its restricted availability, it appears to be more of a “if you know you know” device than the phone you recommend to your uncle when he wonders what to get with his two-year carrier upgrade package. That’s a shame, because this is a very boring, very decent phone that I believe many people would enjoy.

Continue Reading


Micromax IN Note 1 Pro India Version Launch for End of September



Micromax IN Note 1 Pro

Micromax is rumored to be working on the In Note 1 Pro. Micromax is planning to release a new smartphone in the “In” line, which will most likely be dubbed the Micromax In Note 1 Pro.

The phone has also been found on the Geekbench benchmarking site, with a hazy launch timetable. According to the name, the Micromax In Note 1 Pro will most likely be an upgrade to the Micromax In Note 1 phone that was released in India in November of last year.

Micromax is expected to release a new smartphone in September, according to tipster Mukul Sharma. The Micromax In Note 1 Pro is the most likely name for this new smartphone. According to the source, the phone might be released as early as the end of this month. Micromax has not made any statements about a new phone in the ‘In’ series.

The Micromax In Note 1 Pro was recently discovered on Geekbench, confirming the rumors of an impending launch. The phone is listed with the model number E7748 on the benchmarking site, which includes crucial specifications.

The MediaTek MT6785 SoC, which could be the MediaTek Helio G90 chipset, is expected to power the handset. In addition, the Micromax In Note 1 Pro is said to have 4GB of RAM and run on the out-of-date Android 10 OS. Micromax In Note 1 Pro got a single-core score of 519 and a multi-core score of 1,673 on Geekbench. Micromax is expected to release a phone running Android 11 OS on the market.

These specs show that the Micromax In Note 1 Pro is a mid-range gadget with significantly better specs than the Micromax In Note 1. Micromax In Note 1 had a MediaTek Helio G85 SoC, 4GB RAM, and a quad-camera configuration on the back with a 48-megapixel primary camera when it was first released. It has a 16-megapixel selfie camera on the front, as well as a 5,000mAh battery. It has a fingerprint sensor on the back, 128GB of internal storage, and a 3.5mm audio connector.

Continue Reading